Judge Imposes Limit on 'Attritional' Litigation Costs

When a divorcing husband and wife ran up legal costs of more than £150,000 disputing the division of family assets amounting to little more than £200,000, the judge hearing the case described himself as ‘appalled’.

In the initial court hearing, the wife was awarded approximately 6/7 of the couple’s joint assets. Because of her ex-husband’s substantial earnings, she was awarded £3,000 a month in maintenance for herself and the couple’s three children.

When she appealed against the decision – at a cost of a further £12,500 – the judge put his foot down, describing the way she conducted the case as ‘attritional’. Whilst allowing her to appeal, he limited her recoverable costs to £5,000, ‘to discourage profligate waste of costs, particularly in a case with a track record like this’.

The judge hearing the appeal commented, “I recognise that the costs cap that I am imposing will mean that the wife already has unrecoverable costs... If that is what it takes to prevent what the district judge described as a haemorrhaging of money, so be it.”

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.